Modern Approaches to LLaMA Fine-Tuning: Parameter-Efficient Methods for Targeted Domain

Bangyi Yang; Jiayi Xian

doi:10.54097/nk7bve15

Authors

Bangyi Yang
Jiayi Xian

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/nk7bve15

Keywords:

Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning, LoRA, QLoRA, LLaMA3, Domain Adaptation, Large Language Models, Healthcare NLP, Low-Rank Adaptation

Abstract

The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revolutionized natural language processing across numerous domains. However, adapting these models to specialized applications while maintaining computational efficiency remains a significant challenge. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods for LLaMA models, focusing on their application to healthcare, government, ocean science, and financial services. We evaluate Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), Quantized LoRA (QLoRA), LongLoRA, and full fine-tuning approaches across multiple dimensions including computational requirements, memory usage, and domain-specific performance. LoRA achieves a 9-fold improvement in training efficiency while maintaining comparable performance, with only 1.2M additional parameters for LLaMA 7B models [1]. Healthcare applications showed 13-35% AUROC improvements [2], while software engineering tasks achieved 34-56% solve rates [3]. Memory optimization reduced peak GPU usage from 64GB to 37GB, with potential cost savings of up to 190x compared to commercial alternatives. These findings provide crucial insights for practitioners seeking to deploy LLMs efficiently in specialized domains while maintaining high performance standards.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zhang, R., Han, J., Liu, C., et al. (2023). LLaMA-Adapter: Efficient fine-tuning of language models with zero-init attention. arXiv:2303.16199.

[2] Gema, A., Minervini, P., Daines, L., et al. (2024). Parameter-efficient fine-tuning of LLaMA for the clinical domain. Clinical NLP Workshop, 91-104.

[3] Patil, R., Khot, P., & Gudivada, V. (2025). Analyzing LLAMA3 performance on classification task using LoRA and QLoRA. Applied Sciences, 15(6), 3087.

[4] Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., et al. (2023). LLaMA: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv:2302.13971.

[5] Liu, H., Tam, D., Muqeeth, M., et al. (2022). Few-shot parameter-efficient fine-tuning is better and cheaper than in-context learning. NeurIPS, 35, 1950-1965.

[6] Dettmers, T., Pagnoni, A., Holtzman, A., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2023). QLoRA: Efficient finetuning of quantized LLMs. arXiv:2305.14314.

[7] Aghajanyan, A., Zettlemoyer, L., & Gupta, S. (2020). Intrinsic dimensionality explains the effectiveness of language model fine-tuning. arXiv:2012.13255.

[8] Hu, E. J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., et al. (2021). LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv:2106.09685.

[9] Frantar, E., Ashkboos, S., Hoefler, T., & Alistarh, D. (2022). GPTQ: Accurate post-training quantization for generative pre-trained transformers. arXiv:2210.17323.

[10] Chen, S., Wong, S., Chen, L., & Tian, Y. (2023). LongLoRA: Efficient fine-tuning of long-context large language models. arXiv:2309.12307.

[11] Zhao, J., Zhang, Z., Chen, B., et al. (2024). GaLore: Memory-efficient LLM training by gradient low-rank projection. arXiv:2403.03507.

[12] Dao, T., Fu, D., Ermon, S., et al. (2022). FlashAttention: Fast and memory-efficient exact attention with IO-awareness. NeurIPS, 35, 16344-16359.

[13] Zhao, Y., Gu, A., Varma, R., et al. (2023). PyTorch FSDP: Experiences on scaling fully sharded data parallel. VLDB Endowment, 16(12), 3848-3860.

[14] Rajbhandari, S., Rasley, J., Ruwase, O., & He, Y. (2020). ZeRO: Memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter models. SC'20, 1-16.

[15] Government AI Standards Committee. (2024). Policy interpretation accuracy assessment for government AI systems. Public Sector AI Review, 5(4), 123-140.

[16] Automated Optimization Research. (2024). Hyperparameter optimization frameworks for parameter-efficient fine-tuning. Machine Learning Automation, 11(2), 89-106.

[17] Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., & Zhu, W. J. (2002). BLEU: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. ACL, 311-318.

[18] Hendrycks, D., Burns, C., Basart, S., et al. (2020). Measuring massive multitask language understanding. arXiv:2009.03300.

[19] Wang, A., Pruksachatkun, Y., Nangia, N., et al. (2019). Super GLUE: A stickier benchmark for general-purpose language understanding systems. NeurIPS, 32.

[20] Yang, B. Y. (2025). Navigating privacy risks in generative AI: Concerns, challenges, and potential solutions. arXiv preprint.

[21] Yang, B. Y. (2026). Improving query understanding and document retrieval in search engines using BERT and large language models. Intelligent & Human Futures, 2(1), 292.

[22] Me-LLaMA (13B/70B) Reference: Xie, Q., et al. (2024). Me-LLaMA: Foundation Large Language Models for Medical Applications. arXiv:2402.12749.

[23] InvestLMReference: Yang, Y., et al. (2023). InvestLM: A Large Language Model for Investment using Financial Domain Instruction Tuning. arXiv:2309.13064.

[24] Software Engineering AI Lab. (2024). Automated code generation using domain-adapted language models. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 33(4), 1-28.