LLM-Enhanced Financial Appraisal of Mechanical Carbon Capture and Storage Systems through Automated Technical-Economic Analysis

Authors

  • Yao Ge

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/3dwqbf59

Keywords:

Large Language Models, Carbon Capture and Storage, Financial Analysis, Technical-Economic Assessment, Automated Valuation, Natural Language Processing, Investment Appraisal, Risk Assessment

Abstract

The escalating deployment of mechanical carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies demands sophisticated financial appraisal methodologies that can accurately assess the complex technical-economic relationships inherent in these capital-intensive systems. This research presents a novel Large Language Model (LLM) enhanced framework for automated financial analysis of mechanical CCS projects, addressing critical gaps in traditional valuation approaches through advanced natural language processing, automated data synthesis, and intelligent financial modeling capabilities. The proposed system integrates state-of-the-art LLM architectures with domain-specific financial engineering principles to provide comprehensive technical-economic analysis that encompasses capital expenditure optimization, operational cost modeling, revenue stream quantification, and risk assessment across diverse CCS technologies including Direct Air Capture (DAC), point-source capture, and geological storage systems. Through extensive evaluation across 156 CCS projects representing $47.2 billion in total capital investment, our LLM framework demonstrates remarkable improvements in financial analysis accuracy by 34.7%, analysis time reduction of 78%, and risk assessment precision enhancement of 42.3% compared to traditional financial modeling approaches. The system successfully processes complex technical documentation including engineering specifications, environmental impact assessments, regulatory compliance reports, and market analysis data to generate detailed financial projections with confidence intervals and sensitivity analyses. Real-time market data integration enables dynamic updating of financial models based on evolving carbon credit prices, technology costs, and regulatory frameworks, with model recalibration completed within 2.7 hours compared to weeks required for manual analysis updates. The framework incorporates advanced uncertainty quantification through Monte Carlo simulation enhanced with LLM-generated scenario analysis, providing probabilistic financial projections that account for technology performance variations, market volatility, and regulatory changes. Automated report generation capabilities produce investment-grade financial documentation that satisfies due diligence requirements for institutional investors while providing interactive dashboards for real-time project monitoring and performance tracking. Validation against actual CCS project outcomes demonstrates superior predictive accuracy with mean absolute percentage errors below 8.3% for capital cost estimation and 11.7% for operational expense forecasting across 24-month prediction horizons.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Townsend, A. L. E. X., Raji, N. A. B. E. E. L. A., & Zapantis, A. L. E. X. (2020). The value of carbon capture and storage (CCS). Global CCS Institute: Docklands, Australia.

[2] Zhang, T. (2024). Systems Engineering for Carbon Capture and Storage. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

[3] Bolwig, S., Bazbauers, G., Klitkou, A., Lund, P. D., Blumberga, A., Gravelsins, A., & Blumberga, D. (2019). Review of modelling energy transitions pathways with application to energy system flexibility. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 101, 440-452.

[4] Buchanan, D. L. (2025). METALS AND ENERGY FINANCE: Interrelationship between Technical and Financial Risk in Mineral Projects. World Scientific.

[5] Leiss, W., & Krewski, D. (2019). Environmental scan and issue awareness: risk management challenges for CCS. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 22(3-4), 234-253.

[6] Kaur, P., Kashyap, G. S., Kumar, A., Nafis, M. T., Kumar, S., & Shokeen, V. (2024). From text to transformation: A comprehensive review of large language models' versatility. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.16142.

[7] Cao, X., Li, S., Katsikis, V., Khan, A. T., He, H., Liu, Z., ... & Peng, C. (2024). Empowering financial futures: Large language models in the modern financial landscape.

[8] Pan, X., Wang, D., & Tsung, F. (2025). Empowering Intelligent Quality Control with Large Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods, Challenges, and Perspectives. Authorea Preprints.

[9] Yan, Y., Borhani, T. N., Subraveti, S. G., Pai, K. N., Prasad, V., Rajendran, A., ... & Clough, P. T. (2021). Harnessing the power of machine learning for carbon capture, utilisation, and storage (CCUS)–a state-of-the-art review. Energy & Environmental Science, 14(12), 6122-6157.

[10] Wiangkham, A., & Vongvit, R. (2025). Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods for prioritizing influential factors of ChatGPT adoption in higher education. Expert Systems with Applications, 128188.

[11] Araújo, I. L. D. (2021). The Brazilian Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) institutional framework: the new carbon market business in an energy transition economy (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo).

[12] Mahdavi, S., Joshi, P. K., Guativa, L. H., & Singh, U. (2025). Integrating Large Language Models in Financial Investments and Market Analysis: A Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.01990.

[13] Larkin, P., Leiss, W., & Krewski, D. (2019). Risk assessment and management frameworks for carbon capture and geological storage: a global perspective. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 22(3-4), 254-285.

[14] Sorgi, C., De Gennaro, V., & Mandiuc, A. (2024). A New Methodology for Quantitative Risk Assessment of CO2 Leakage in CCS Projects. SPE Journal, 29(12), 7214-7233.

[15] Rassool, D. (2021). Unlocking private finance to support CCS investments. Global CCS Institute, Melbourne.

[16] Lu, Y. (2019). Artificial intelligence: a survey on evolution, models, applications and future trends. Journal of management analytics, 6(1), 1-29.

[17] Gao, R., Zhang, Z., Shi, Z., Xu, D., Zhang, W., & Zhu, D. (2021, October). A review of natural language processing for financial technology. In International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics 2021 (Vol. 11884, pp. 262-277). SPIE.

[18] Nie, Y., Kong, Y., Dong, X., Mulvey, J. M., Poor, H. V., Wen, Q., & Zohren, S. (2024). A survey of large language models for financial applications: Progress, prospects and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11903.

[19] Chen, Z. Z., Ma, J., Zhang, X., Hao, N., Yan, A., Nourbakhsh, A., ... & Wang, W. Y. (2024). A survey on large language models for critical societal domains: Finance, healthcare, and law. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.01769.

[20] Adu, E., Zhang, Y., & Liu, D. (2019). Current situation of carbon dioxide capture, storage, and enhanced oil recovery in the oil and gas industry. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 97(5), 1048-1076.

[21] Ukoba, K., Olatunji, K. O., Adeoye, E., Jen, T. C., & Madyira, D. M. (2024). Optimizing renewable energy systems through artificial intelligence: Review and future prospects. Energy & Environment, 35(7), 3833-3879.

[22] Manfren, M., Gonzalez-Carreon, K. M., & James, P. A. (2024). Interpretable data-driven methods for building energy modelling—a review of critical connections and gaps. Energies, 17(4), 881.

[23] Asafo-Adjei, B. A. (2025). Navigating Complexities: Examining Project Managerial Challenges in the Implementation of LNGBased Carbon Capture and Storage Projects.

[24] Faber, G., Ruttinger, A., Strunge, T., Langhorst, T., Zimmermann, A., van der Hulst, M., ... & Tao, L. (2022). Adapting technology learning curves for prospective techno-economic and life cycle assessments of emerging carbon capture and utilization pathways. Frontiers in climate, 4, 820261.

[25] García, J., Leiva-Araos, A., Diaz-Saavedra, E., Moraga, P., Pinto, H., & Yepes, V. (2023). Relevance of machine learning techniques in water infrastructure integrity and quality: A review powered by natural language processing. Applied Sciences, 13(22), 12497.

[26] Van der Spek, M., Roussanaly, S., & Rubin, E. S. (2019). Best practices and recent advances in CCS cost engineering and economic analysis. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 83, 91-104.

[27] Bala, R., Kaur, M., Thakur, H., Kashyap, P., Karnwal, A., & Malik, T. (2025). A Sociotechnical Review of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) Technologies for Industrial Decarbonization: Current Challenges, Emerging Solution, and Future Directions. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2025(1), 7195300.

[28] Adekunle, B. I., Chukwuma-Eke, E. C., Balogun, E. D., & Ogunsola, K. O. (2023). Developing a digital operations dashboard for real-time financial compliance monitoring in multinational corporations. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 9(3), 728-746.

[29] Tumpa, R. J., & Naeni, L. (2025). Improving decision-making and stakeholder engagement at project governance using digital technology for sustainable infrastructure projects. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 14(4), 1292-1329.

[30] Pattanayak, S. K. (2022). Generative AI for market analysis in business consulting: Revolutionizing data insights and competitive intelligence. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Management & Computer Applications, 11, 74-86.

[31] Li, W., Liu, W., Deng, M., Liu, X., & Feng, L. (2025). The impact of large language models on accounting and future application scenarios. Journal of Accounting Literature.

[32] Omopariola, B. J., & Aboaba, V. (2019). Comparative analysis of financial models: Assessing efficiency, risk, and sustainability. Int J Comput Appl Technol Res, 8(5), 217-231.

[33] Patil, A. (2025). Advancing Software Quality: A Standards-Focused Review of LLM-Based Assurance Techniques. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13766.

[34] Mohanarajesh, K. (2024). Investigate Methods for Visualizing the Decision-Making Processes of a Complex AI System, Making Them More Understandable and Trustworthy in financial data analysis.

[35] Olubusola, O., Mhlongo, N. Z., Daraojimba, D. O., Ajayi-Nifise, A. O., & Falaiye, T. (2024). Machine learning in financial forecasting: A US review: Exploring the advancements, challenges, and implications of AI-driven predictions in financial markets. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(2), 1969-1984.

[36] Tomar, M., & Periyasamy, V. (2023). The role of reference data in financial data analysis: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN: 2959-6386 (online), 1(1), 90-99.

Downloads

Published

22-09-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ge, Y. (2025). LLM-Enhanced Financial Appraisal of Mechanical Carbon Capture and Storage Systems through Automated Technical-Economic Analysis. Computer Life, 13(3), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.54097/3dwqbf59