A Dynamic Alignment Mechanism for Curriculum in Higher Vocational Education under Emerging Technology Ecosystems: The Case of HarmonyOS Talent Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/nd37dy08Keywords:
Emerging technology ecosystem, Dynamic curriculum alignment, HarmonyOS talent development, Smart ship, Competency-based education, Design-based researchAbstract
The training cycle for technical talent is measured in years, whereas emerging technologies iterate in quarters or months. When the time for a technology to become an essential competence for mainstream industrial positions is shorter than a full program of study, a vocational curriculum characterized by fixed structures remains perpetually in a state of "catching up." Taking the full-scenario distributed operating system ecosystem (HarmonyOS / OpenHarmony) as the technological context and smart ships as the application scenario, this study adopts design-based research to conduct three iterative cycles. It finds that alignment failures are distributed across four levels—training orientation, instructional carriers, collaboration mechanisms, and faculty development—whose common mechanism is the absence of routine demand transmission and system adjustment channels. Accordingly, the study proposes a three-dimensional dynamic alignment framework—"technology trajectory–curriculum architecture–industrial competency map"—together with three design principles: structural decomposability, authentic carriers, and external standards. It further constructs five mechanisms covering curriculum structure, project chains, collaboration platforms, multi-source evaluation, and faculty renewal. Evidence from three iterations shows positive changes in technical competency attainment, engineering practice outcomes, and faculty capability, while exposing unresolved issues such as curriculum updating lagging behind technological evolution; because the pilot class has not yet graduated, long-term effects at the job-performance level await follow-up. The transferable value of this mechanism lies in its operating logic of "demand identification–system adjustment–effect evaluation–recalibration."
Downloads
References
[1] Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (2025). HarmonyOS ecosystem solution white paper (2025 edition) [White paper].
[2] China Classification Society. (2020). Rules for smart ships [Standard]. China Classification Society.
[3] Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. American Association of School Administrators.
[4] Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
[5] Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9
[6] Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
[7] Zhang, P., & Nan, X. G. (2024). Coexistence and coupling: High-quality development of vocational education from the perspective of new quality productive forces. Journal of Higher Education Management, (18), 1-10.
[8] Cheng, B., & Zhang, B. Y. (2024). Exploration of teaching reform in embedded systems courses based on OpenHarmony. Open Access Library Journal, 11, Article e12692. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1112692
[9] Tang, J. Q. (2025). Exploring interdisciplinary project-based teaching reform of "AI meets HarmonyOS" in higher-vocational IoT programs. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 13, 336-348. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2025.136023
[10] Zhu, Y., Jing, R., & Tang, J. (2026). The curriculum reform and practical exploration of HarmonyOS application development under the background of emerging engineering education. ERD, 8(7), 50-56.
[11] Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
[12] Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Computer Life

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







